Articles
Conforming to the Rule of Law: When Person and Human Being Finally Mean the Same Thing in Fourteenth Amendment Jurisprudence (thesis) 22 Issues in L. & Med. 119-303 (Fall 2006/Spring 2007) (Special Issue)
by Dr. Charles I. LugosiThis premier article by Dr. Charles I. Lugosi is a MUST read for anyone interested in understanding the underlying legal basis for the "Personhood" Campaign in Georgia.
ABSTRACT - "The Fourteenth Amendment was intended to protect people from discrimination and harm from other people. Racism is not the only thing people need protection from. As a constitutional principle, the Fourteenth Amendment is not confined to its historical origin and purpose, but is available now to protect all human beings, including all unborn human beings."
Downloading and printing this article is limited by copyright to one copy per person for personal use. Additional copies may be purchased from Issues in Law & Medicine, which is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. Single issues are $23. Requests may be sent to Issues in Law & Medicine, 3 South 6th Street, Terre Haute, IN 47807-3510.
Conforming to the Rule of Law: When Person and Human Being Finally Mean the Same Thing in Fourteenth Amendment Jurisprudence, 4 Georgetown J. of L. & Pub. Policy 361-452 (2006)
by Dr. Charles I. LugosiThe abridged version was printed in the Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 4:361. Downloading and printing this article is limited by copyright to one copy per person for personal use. Additional copies may be purchased by writing to: Office of Journal Administration, Georgetown University Law Center, 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001, or send fax to (202) 662-9491. Please allow at least one business week for processing.
Human Life Amendment Talking Points
Personhood: A Call to Arms
by Dan BeckerFetal Personhood: It's Simple
by Greg KouklAbortion, Bioethics and Personhood: A Philosophical Reflection
by Francis BeckwithRepublicans and Abortion
by Francis BeckwithAbortion in the Bible and Church History
by Randy Alcorn'No abortions, no exceptions,' in sight - Georgia group aims for constitutional amendment in 2008
by WorldNetDaily.comHuman Life Amendment
by the National Committee for a Human Life AmendmentPersonhood Proclamation
by Ronald ReaganAbortion and the Conscience of the Nation
by Ronald ReaganWhat is Personhood
by Abort73.comEmbryos: Persons or Property
by Steve JordahlGeorgia Lawmaker Promotes Abortion Ban, Prospects Better Now
by LifeNews.comThe Personhood Crisis
by Judie Brown
Secular Articles: Biotechnology at the Margins of Personhood: An Evolving Legal Paradigm
By: Linda MacDonald Glenn, Esq.In April 1998, biologist Stuart Newman and biotech critic Jeremy Rifkin applied for a patent for a "humanzee," part human and part chimpanzee, in a calculated move designed to re-ignite debate about the morality of patenting life forms and engineering human beings.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (hereinafter, PTO) denied the patent, acknowledging that, although it has permitted the extensive patenting of biotech-engineered life forms and human DNA, 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution forbids the ownership, and they considered this application to be too close to the patenting of human beings."
This excerpt comes from a fascinating and very insightful CANADIAN article.
Please Note: Georgia Right to Life does not necessarily endorse every viewpoint expressed on these sites. Nor does the absence of a link to a particular site imply any disapproval of that site. If you have an article you'd like to submit, click here.
