Worldviews Biblical
A central theme of Vision Forum Ministries and our Witherspoon School of Law and Public Policy is that God’s written revelation — the Bible — is sufficient for all of faith and practice. The Bible, not human emotions, pragmatism, natural law reasoning, or utilitarianism, is the basis for all ethical choices. The Bible is the only standard.
In 2005 Christian bio-ethicist Nigel Cameron spoke to the National Right to Life Convention. His challenge to the prolife community was to consider moving beyond abortion as the singular focus of our pro-life endeavors. He said, "In the 21st century it will not be enough to simply be pro-life, one must also be pro-human."
Michael Sleasman, Managing Director and Research Scholar for The Center for Bioethics & Human Dignity explains, "while many of the ethical questions of the late 20th Century dealt with bioethical concerns over the beginning and end of life issues (the making and taking of human life), the questions raised by these new, these emerging technologies threaten to change the nature of the human species and the very essence of what it means to be human."
by Thomas Glessner
Beginning in 1973 with the infamous Roe v. Wade decision American society has increasingly accepted the concept that humanity can be divorced from personhood and thereby some human beings can be manipulated and destroyed for the selfish gains of others because they are not considered "persons.”
The Path to Personhood: A must see history of God's faithfulness to His principles |
The Prolife Cause and the Coming Revolution
Abortion and the Death of Man by Nigel M. de S. Cameron
Personhood attorney Robert Muise's excellent article on state Human Life amendments
Is Human Life Ever Negotiable?
As we enter the 21st century, Georgia Right to Life finds itself in the middle of a raging debate regarding the future of the pro-life movement.
Can we support laws that are less than perfect?
Posthumanism is not a formal religion, but rather, it is driven by a series of underlying religious beliefs. Posthumanists, for example, believe that finite and temporal limits of the human body place severe constraints upon the human will.
"We in the Eugenics movement are not interested in competing against Adolph Hitler or Karl Marx for some minuscule little 1,000 year Reich. We are interested in competing with Jesus Christ and Buddha for the destiny of man."
Remaking Humans: The New Utopians Versus a Truly Human Future
The new technopians actually have a name for themselves: transhumanists. According to the World Transhumanist Association: "Transhumanism (as the term suggests) is a sort of humanism plus.
Another View of the Singularity Summit: Is the "Singularity" for Everyone?
Are we approaching technological changes that will merge biological and non-biological intelligence, fuse the man-machine relationship, and blur the lines between reality and virtual reality?
World Transhumanist Association
We support the development of and access to new technologies that enable everyone to enjoy better minds, better bodies and better lives.
Transhumanism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Democratic Transhumanism 2.0: Citizen Cyborg
"Let the ruling classes and Luddites tremble at a democratic transhumanist revolution. "
